Maladaptive remodeling is associated with impaired survival in women but not in men after aortic valve replacement.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to test whether adaptive or maladaptive remodeling is associated with survival in women and men after aortic valve replacement (AVR). BACKGROUND: Women with isolated aortic valve stenosis (AS) develop more concentric left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) than men in similar disease states. We recently reported less up-regulation of profibrotic genes at AVR and faster LVH regression post-operatively in women than in men, suggesting that there are sex differences in the adaptation to pressure overload and its regression. METHODS: The study cohort included 128 patients (age 70.0 ± 9.6 years, 49% women) undergoing AVR for AS. Echocardiography was obtained before and 4.0 ± 1.6 years after surgery. Factor analysis was used to classify LVH as adaptive (combining smaller left ventricular [LV] mass/diameters and greater relative wall thicknesses) or maladaptive. Myocardial tissue samples from the LV septum were obtained during AVR to analyze cardiac fibrosis and associated key molecular regulators. RESULTS: Before AVR, LVH was classified as adaptive in 62% of women and 45% of men (p < 0.050). Four years after AVR, adaptive LVH was observed in 75% of women and 49% of men (p < 0.031). At surgery, more cardiac fibrosis was present in men compared with women (p < 0.05). Higher levels of transforming growth factor beta 1 (p < 0.01), SMAD2 phosphorylation (p < 0.001), and periostin expression (p < 0.05) were found in men than in women. Women with maladaptive LVH had worse survival than women with adaptive LVH (p < 0.050), whereas the pattern of LVH did not affect survival in men (p < 0.307). CONCLUSIONS: Women more frequently exhibit adaptive LV remodeling with less fibrosis than men. Maladaptive LVH is associated with worse survival in women. Thus, sex should be considered as a strong modulating factor when management of patients with AS is discussed.

Sex-dependent regulation of fibrosis and inflammation in human left ventricular remodelling under pressure overload.

AIMS: Women with aortic stenosis develop a more concentric form of LV hypertrophy than men. However, the molecular factors underlying sex differences in LV remodelling are incompletely understood. We took an unbiased approach to identify sex-specific patterns in gene expression and pathway regulation, and confirmed the most prominent findings in human hearts. METHODS AND RESULTS: Echocardiography was performed in 104 patients (53.8% women) with aortic stenosis before aortic valve replacement. LV mass, LV end-diastolic diameter, and relative wall thickness were included in a factor analysis to generate an index classifying LV remodelling as adaptive or maladaptive. Maladaptive remodelling was present in 64.6% of male and in 32.7% of female patients (P < 0.01). Genome-wide expression profiling of LV samples was performed in a representative subgroup of 19 patients (52.6% women) compared with samples from healthy controls (n = 18). Transcriptome characterization revealed that fibrosis-related genes/pathways were induced in male overloaded ventricles, while extracellular matrix-related and inflammatory genes/pathways were repressed in female overloaded ventricles (adjusted P < 0.05). We confirmed gene regulation by quantitative real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction and immunoblotting analysis, and we further demonstrate the relevance of our findings by histological documentation of higher fibrosis in men than in women. CONCLUSION: We conclude that in pressure overload distinct molecular processes are regulated between men and women. Maladaptive LV remodelling occurs more frequently in men and is associated with greater activation of profibrotic and inflammatory markers. Collectively, sex-specific regulation of these processes may contribute to sex differences in the progression to heart failure.